Infowars.com

PrisonPlanet.tv

Listen
Now

Advanced
Search

Log
InRegister Now

Home

Alex Jones Radio
Show

Listening
Info

Listen Live

Sunday Show

Podcast

Services

Infowars Shop

Infowars.net

Newsgroup

Forum

Archives

Featured
Stories

World News

Prison
Planet

Commentary

Multimedia

Sci
Tech

Special
Reports

Paul Watson
Articles

Steve
Watson Articles

Links

Infowars

Prison Planet TV

Infowars.net

Social

Alex Jones Twitter

Alex Jones
Facebook

Prison Planet Forum

Prison Planet
Twitter

Shopping
Cart

Infowars Shop

Contact

Advertise

Contact

Featured
Stories World News Commentary Money Watch Multimedia Prison Planet U.S.
News Science And Technology

‘Footage That Kills 9/11 Conspiracy Theories’ Actually Validates
Them

Daily Mail in laughable hit piece that claims weakening of ‘exterior beams’
caused WTC 7 collapse

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Wednesday,
November 2, 2011

In perhaps one of the weakest and downright laughable 9/11 hit pieces ever
published, the UK’s Daily Mail newspaper, not noted for its commitment to
accuracy, presents old footage as new to make the ludicrous claim that WTC 7
collapsed due to “exterior” damage caused by fires.

The
Mail article claims the video was recently released via a FOIA request and
represents new footage, yet virtually
identical footage has been available for years, as well as high quality
photographs which depict the same scene showing World Trade Center Building 7,
which was not hit by a plane, shortly before its collapse in the late afternoon
of 9/11.

The story, written by Meghan Keneally, claims that the “unseen”
footage “kills the conspiracy theories” surrounding the collapse of WTC 7 as it
shows the building being “consumed by fire”.

According to Keneally, the clip proves that “Building 7 was
brought down by the intense heat of the blazing World Trade Center.” Presumably,
she means the twin towers of the World Trade Center which had already collapsed
into rubble eight hours before WTC 7 imploded.

In reality, the footage shows nothing that we didn’t already know
– specifically that the building was not “consumed by fire,” as has happened in
the case of numerous
other modern buildings which did not collapse despite being ravaged by
flames at every level.

The video clip only serves to confirm the fact that the fires in
WTC 7 were relatively limited and by no means had “consumed” the building. The
fires were nowhere near powerful enough to threaten the structural integrity of
a 47-story building.

However, this is by no means the most ludicrous aspect of the Mail
hit piece. Keneally goes on to bizarrely claim that the footage proves how “the
building’s exterior frame could no longer withstand the high temperatures,” and
how the “buckling” of these “exterior metal beams,” “led to floors falling in on
one another, causing the building to collapse.”

Yes you read that correctly – Keneally is claiming that the
structural integrity of modern buildings – the part that prevents them from
collapsing – rests on “exterior metal beams”

Even NIST’s official investigation of the collapse, which has been
challenged by the thousands of professionals who make up Architects and
Engineers for 9/11 Truth, was not stupid enough to suggest that “exterior”
damage can cause a building to collapse in its own footprint. The official
report, which Keneally has obviously not even checked, claims that the fires
weakened the interior core columns of the building, not the “exterior metal
beams”.

If you knew that a building was supported by its “exterior” beams
you wouldn’t even dare go inside. The building would never even be approved for
construction in the first place.

According to Keneally, the footage shows “how there is legitimacy
to the explanation provided by the government’s 9/11 Commission investigation,”
which is a strange argument to make considering the fact that the 9/11
Commission didn’t even investigate the collapse of WTC 7.

In accusing “conspiracy theorists” of inventing “wild claims” to
substantiate their explanations, Keneally has dreamt up the wildest claim yet –
that the structural integrity of modern buildings rests on their exterior beams
and window frames.

One wonders how such a ham-fisted and inadequate story, which
comes across like it was written by a child for a school essay, can make it past
the editorial board and into the pages of a major national newspaper.

A d v e r t i s e m e n t

As we have documented, WTC 7 was a
structurally reinforced building that was designed to have floors removed
without collapsing.

In its final
report on the collapse of WTC 7, NIST claimed that the never before observed
“new phenomenon” of “thermal expansion” was to blame for the destruction of the
building, a completely ludicrous conclusion in a report that simply ignores
eyewitness testimony and hard evidence that points to the deliberate demolition
of the structure.

NIST completely fails to address prior knowledge of the building’s
collapse, including why news outlets like the BBC and
CNN reported that the building had collapsed an hour before it actually
fell, as well as firefighters on the scene who are heard on video saying,
“Keep your eye on that building, it’ll be coming down soon.

If the collapse of WTC 7 came as a result of a “new phenomenon”
and an “extraordinary event” that had never happened before in the history of
building collapses, then why did news stations and ground zero workers know it
was about to happen a hour or more in advance?

NIST claims that the collapse of Building 7 is “The first known
instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building”.

We are actually being asked to believe the impossible – that WTC 7
was the only building in history to have defied all precedent and suffered a
complete and almost instantaneous collapse from fire damage alone, despite this
being an impossibility if one accepts the basic laws of physics as accurate.

The issue of molten metal, which was discovered under both the
twin towers and WTC 7, suggesting an extremely hot burning agent was used in the
demolition process, is completely ignored in NIST’s report, despite it being
acknowledged in Appendix C of FEMA’s World Trade Center Building Performance
Study, which stated:

Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the
steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular
melting, was readily visible in the near-surface microstructure. A liquid
eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during
this hot corrosion attack on the steel… The severe corrosion and subsequent
erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for
the source of the sulfur has been identified.

Speaking during a press conference that was called to counter
NIST, Richard Gage, founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth and a
member of the American Institute of Architects, dismissed the report.

“Tons of [molten metal] was found 21 days after the attack,” said
Gage in an interview with a Vancouver, Canada television station. “Steel doesn’t
begin to melt until 2,700 degrees, which is much hotter than what these fires
could have caused.”

The core of NIST’s explanation, that an “extraordinary event”
called “thermal expansion” was to blame for the sudden total collapse of the
building is of course on the face of it a fraud when one considers the innumerable
number of buildings that have suffered roaring fires across the majority of
their floors and remained standing, whereas WTC 7 suffered limited fire
damage across less than a quarter of its total floor space.

NIST also claims that the building only fell at 40% free fall
speed, as if this isn’t suspicious in itself. Remember that this 47-story
behemoth took just 7 seconds to completely collapse within its own footprint
falling through the path of most resistance.

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order
Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show.

Print this page.

Comment
Rules

PRISONPLANET LOGIN
Log
In
Register
Lost
password?

29 Responses to “‘Footage That Kills 9/11 Conspiracy Theories’
Actually Validates Them”

DC122112 says:

November
2, 2011 at 5:38 am

Good morning fellow freedom fighters & Liberty lovers.Todays gonna be
ah good day.Let’s wake some &%$#@ &%#$ up today.If you got
Facebook-flood it with Infowar news all day

Quantummonkeybutt Reply:
November 2nd, 2011 at 5:55 am

“…’unseen’ footage ‘kills the conspiracy theories’ surrounding the collapse
of WTC 7 as it shows the building being ‘consumed by fire’…”

Really???

I Asked A TWO-YEAR OLD(!) WHAT WOULD HAPPEN TO THE BUILDING???

YOU KNOW WHAT SHE SAID??? (Yes She Can Talk, My Friends Do Not Allow
Vaccinations)…

“THE FIREMEN WOULD COME AND PUT OUT THE FIRE!”

A FU&%ING TWO-YEAR OLD CAN FIGURE THIS OUT, BUT YOU CAN’T??? I Guess We
Know YOU Are Fully Up To Date On YOUR Vaccinations, eh Monkey Girl!?!?!?!?!
hahahaha lol!!!!! hahahaha lol!!!!! :/

WHAT THE FU&% IS WRONG WITH
YOU???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

(www.) youtube.com/watch?v=2IWJX879fOk

QMB
& they call
ME ‘crazy’?

Quantummonkeybutt Reply:
November 2nd, 2011 at 6:02 am

One Of My Favorite ’911′ ‘NATIONAL TRAITOR DAY’ VIDEOS OF ALL TIME…

LARRY SILVERSTEIN SAYING THE NEW YORK FIRE DEPT “PULLED” WTC-7, A VERY
SPECIFIC DEMOLITION TERM MEANING COMPLETE VERTICAL FREE-FALL DESTRUCTION OF A
HIGH-RISE BUILDING…

PLEASE GO FULL-SCREEN (Right Mouse Click, Select Zoom, Select Full-Screen)
AND CRANK THIS SHIT UP!!!

(www.) prisonplanet.com/articles/september2005/120905insidejob.htm

QMB
sees your
evil deeds

billp Reply:
November 2nd,
2011 at 7:11 am

As he explained the order was not to bring the building down. It was for
all the NWO elite to start pulling their johnsons — or something believable
like that.

Log in to Reply

anon says:

November
2, 2011 at 5:41 am

They keep flogging the same dead horse over and over, they won’t give it
up.

Log in to Reply

DC122112 says:

November
2, 2011 at 5:41 am

Ha Alex,have you ever heard the blues song “Death Letter” -from the
skeleton key soundtrack ?…it would some great buffer music.

Log in to Reply

frontline says:

November
2, 2011 at 5:45 am

how stupid these scumfucks are…murdering m and fing traitors …the
moneychangers and there NWO of hell on earth is going down just like there 911
attacks on these building period

Log in to Reply

prisoner says:

November
2, 2011 at 5:46 am

do not believe your lying eyes.does it really matter,Larry made money,saved
demo cost.does it?

Log in to Reply

prisoner says:

November
2, 2011 at 5:53 am

hey if they find your 101 howie,or 50bmc.stomp your feet,tell them it is a
jelly bean maker,and stop creating conspiracy’s,or you will place them under
citizens arrest.

Log in to Reply

benth163 says:

November
2, 2011 at 5:54 am

Self appointed experts, who do not know squat, are showing themselves to be
morons of the highest order, (or is that the “Lowest Order)…….
There are
also videos showing major steel beams being turned to dust in mid air by what
some call Scalar Weapons. In another video there are quesitons revoling around
the mass that ended up in the basement footprint of the twin towers which was
supposedly only a fraction of the mass of the buildings. What happened to that
mass?
If the American people do not want to believe what real experts
(Engineers) are telling them, we have truly bought into the lie.
It was
Joseph Goebbles who said; “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it,
people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for
such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic
and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for
the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the
mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest
enemy of the State.”
SO HERE WE STAND ON THE EDGE OF A PRECIPUS BELIEVING
THEM WHEN THEY TOLD US WE HAD WINGS INSTEAD OF BELIEVING IN THE KNOWLEDGE WE
HAVE OF OURSELVES.
The Nazi planks are being laid down one by one so
smoothly that most Americans don’t know what they are walking on. It is time
to wake up and stop swallowing the pabalum they’re trying to feed us. Look
them in the eye and call them the liers that they are, and then ready yourself
to do battle, for power will not so willingly give up its position even when
confronted with the truth !!!

Anastasya Reply:
November 2nd,
2011 at 7:15 am

Hurricane Erin, the category 3 storm that sat off the coast of New York for
24 hours on 9/11 is still largely unknown of by the masses. If it’s energy was
harnessed as a giant Tesla coil by advanced Electromagnetic weaponry, then we,
the people, have a whole lot of catching-up to do.

Log in to Reply

the sage says:

November
2, 2011 at 6:00 am

We all know the building had rats. And the rats ate through the steel over
decades and this caused the collapse.

Room101 Reply:
November 2nd,
2011 at 6:15 am

Those steel eating rats are a Bitch! They even got in Towers 1 and 2
too!

Log in to Reply

Mr. Thrillkill says:

November
2, 2011 at 6:14 am

Premeditated murder … “confiscation” and removal of evidence … media
coverup.

Note the quotation marks … “theft” has been redefined by the established
institutions, as “confiscation,” which in legal theory, is the lawful
forfeiture of goods to the public treasury.

Who funded the design and construction of the World Trade Center ? Did
these so called foundations use their own “hard earned” money to accomplish
this feat, or did they reach into the pockets of the U.C.S.A. taxpayers ?

Yeah, they’re really working hard.
I suppose we’re gonna see Bosco roll
up his shirt sleeves, when his reelction campaign gets under way.
Then back
on the golf cart to play another round
… wow, what a life !!!

Log in to Reply

Robert Lane Aiassa
says:

November
2, 2011 at 6:16 am

FACT: In 1995 Bill Clinton Had Ordered (F.E.M.A.) to conduct testing on the
stablility of the WTC Structure using demolitions material on the actual
foundation itself; at the time it was determined in case of a hurricane or
other uncontrolled events in the change of weather; such as a flood, damage
and control becuase it is below sea level. They used nanfite 1995; similar to
the efects cause to the Alfrfed Murry Building, OK. I’ve studied this and
Timothy McVeigh was trained by the US Army, and CIA as a demoltions expert; he
took a “Oath” and never talked, NEVER talked. Terry Nichols was married to a
“hispanic” woman, with three children, it had nothing to do with any movement.
Why do you think they executed “Timothy McViegh” so quickly?? Right after
9-11-2001, the JP Morgan, with the owner; Larry Silverstein, the insurance
agency (3 wks) filed a lawsuit to collect $3.8 Billion, and $4.2 Billion In
actual Damages, and argued they should collect an aditional, $1.7 billion for
tower number 7, (PUBLIC RECORD) until the Patriot act went into effect. , and
why the remodel in August, 1999, and the increse of insurance, the
disapperance of the Black boxes, and why did WTO, they attempt to move
subsides of the corporation to seattle, WA. , and that was only 1 1/2 years
later – with them arguingwhat they called a tained election 2000. , and vowing
revenge against the Republican party!!

Ton Blair – Best Freinds, To Bill Clinton, and Who Got Him Elected As Prime
Minister!!

Doesn’t anyone see the truth?!!! Stop Evil- and Stop The War!!!

End of Report.

Electronically Signed, Robert Lane Aiassa 11/02/2011

Log in to Reply

prisoner says:

November
2, 2011 at 6:17 am

she is feeding herself lobster,by feeding others,mushroom food.

Log in to Reply

Robert Lane Aiassa
says:

November
2, 2011 at 6:18 am

Why Is It A Mystery??

Log in to Reply

Robert Lane Aiassa
says:

November
2, 2011 at 6:20 am

They profited Several Billions In Dollars- Plus – TO Enforce??

Getting the People To Re-Unite??

Making people believe it?? It is not beyond this government if you don’t
beilive it look at Waco , Texas!!

Log in to Reply

Robert Lane Aiassa
says:

November
2, 2011 at 6:21 am

OCCUPY WALL STREET—- WE NEED AN ANTI- WAR MOVEMENT!!

Log in to Reply

captain obvious says:

November
2, 2011 at 6:51 am

first off, this biotch is a complete moron… (lets hope she sees this
post)

the economy and financial fraud was front page news before 911.
the
financial fraud investigations by the SEC, in WTC7 that wasnt hit by a
plane,
werent gonna put OSAMA BIN LADEN into a jail cell.. but DC-Wall
Street-Banksters..?

on 9-10-01, Cynthia McKinney grilled rumsfeld about 2.3 trillion “missing”
from the pentagon,
and no-bid contracts to known child sex slave
trafficking DYNCORP.
how did OSAMA BIN LADEN know exactly where the
pentagons accounting dept was?

2 buildings with pending financial fraud investigations knocked out same
day is coincidence?
rumsfeld said the pentagon was hit by a missile, ONCE.
hey, I believe him.

lucky larry said “they made a decision to pull it”, is the term for a
CD…
not “evacuating firefighters”.. who werent even in the friggin
building.. hello?
real cute how he bought “terrorist insurance” 6-7 weeks
before the staged event.

“put-options” placed against airlines werent investigated either, how
convenient.

bldg 7 of the WTC,
they burned the paperwork, dropped the building to
scatter the ashes,
then carted all the computer harddrives away with the
rubble ASAP.
all the BS’n in the world cannot negate the facts,
tough
shit “Meghan Keneally”, you’re just another lying criminal.

prisoner Reply:
November 2nd,
2011 at 7:15 am

Cynthia i would stand side by side with her,if needed asked.

Log in to Reply

billp says:

November
2, 2011 at 7:07 am

This is great. So no longer do demolition experts have to plant lots of
dangerous explosives in buildings. They just have to set fires in the right
locations and the building will fall straight down into its own footprint. Why
aren’t they studying how to do this?

Log in to Reply

billp says:

November
2, 2011 at 7:08 am

The debate on this is really over. Now it is just a matter of what is going
to be done about it.

Log in to Reply

between_the_lines
says:

November
2, 2011 at 7:29 am

• 9/11 was an inside job:
h**p://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrnmbUDeHus
–
Video of WTC Building 7 falling perfectly vertically on its own
footprint, at freefall speed. NO PLANE HIT THIS BUILDING. Buildings just don’t
fall like this by themselves.
The only way to cause a steel framed building
to fall one-floor-after-another in sequence is to sever all the vertical
girders on each floor simultaneously, one floor after another, in perfect
ascending or descending order. That is: a controlled demolition, using
carefully-placed steel-cutting explosive charges, connected to a central
timer.
How could cave-dwelling Afghans have gotten inside-access to the
building for months, to set it up for such a textbook demolition? And where
would they have gotten the expertese and technology from? It takes a team of
12 experts about 3 months to set a building that size up for controlled
demolition.
It had to have been done by insiders with inside access. And if
they did WTC-7 they did the whole thing.

between_the_lines Reply:
November 2nd, 2011 at 7:29 am

• 9/11 was a false-flag operation,
designed to place the blame on Arab
Muslims, so that Americans would see the enemies of the Jewish state as our
own enemies, and therefore more gladly fight wars for the Jewish state. The
false-flag operation was run as an inside job by traitors within the US
government, loyal to the Jewish owners of our central bank and currency, and
not to the people who elected the traitors.

between_the_lines Reply:
November 2nd, 2011 at 7:30 am

• The 9/11 commission was a coverup:
The White House first choice to
head the Commission was Henry Kissinger(Jewish). Their next and final choice
was Phillip Zelikow(Jewish).
Only two individuals on the Commission were
allowed to see all of the classified information presented to the Commission,
they were Philip Zelikow(Jewish) and Jamie Gorelick[female](Jewish). This is
why the Commission ignored the Mossad involvement in 9/11, including :
-
the surveillance of the hijackers in Florida and the Dancing Israelis in New
Jersey, and
- the white van carrying explosives, driven by Israelis,
stopped on the George Washington Bridge by security service officers who
suspected they intended to blow up the main crossing between New Jersey and
New York.
Philip Zelikow(Jewish), the executive director basically ran the
9/11 Commission and wrote the final report. He wrote the outline of the final
report before they even started the investigation.
He was the author of the
book: “Pre-Emptive War Doctrine”. He was also a witness. He testified before
the Commission because he was part of the “National Security transition
team”.
Co-chairmen of the 9/11 commission: Thomas Kean(Gentile) and Lee
Hamilton(Gentile), wrote a book in 2006 about the constraints they faced as
commissioners titled “Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11
Commission”, in it they say say “We were set up to
fail”.
h**p://www.amazon.com/Without-Precedent-Inside-Story-Commission/dp/0307263770
The
9/11 Report relied upon “tortured confessions.” None of the Commissioners had
access to the witnesses, or alleged masterminds. Key evidence was
systematically destroyed- including the audiotapes from the air traffic
controllers who were communicating with the planes on 9/11, the videotapes of
the interrogations of the “Al Qaeda suspects.”

between_the_lines Reply:
November 2nd, 2011 at 7:31 am

• Some people made a lot of money off of their foreknowlege:
- Larry
Silverstein massive insurance bonanza.
Financial transactions in the days
before the attack strongly indicates foreknowledge of the attack was used to
reap huge profits. The evidence of insider trading includes:
- Huge surges
in purchases of put options on stocks of the two airlines used in the attack —
United Airlines and American Airlines
- Surges in purchases of put options
on stocks of reinsurance companies expected to pay out billions to cover
losses from the attack — Munich Re and the AXA Group
- Surges in purchases
of put options on stocks of financial services companies hurt by the attack —
Merrill Lynch & Co., and Morgan Stanley and Bank of America
- Huge
surge in purchases of call options of stock of a weapons manufacturer expected
to gain from the attack — Raytheon
- Huge surges in purchases of 5-Year US
Treasury Notes
]]
h**p://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/stockputs.html

between_the_lines Reply:
November 2nd, 2011 at 7:36 am

• Some ADMIT
GUILT
h**p://www.wat.tv/video/wtc-pull-it-by-larry-silverstein-xmqs_2h86r_.html
-
WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein(Jewish) ADMITS they decided to ‘pull it’(WTC
7)

h**p://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRfhUezbKLw
- 5 Dancing Israelis(Jewish)
arrested on 9/11 ADMIT on Israeli TV they knew what was going to
happen

Log in to Reply

prisoner says:

November
2, 2011 at 7:37 am

i needed no more evidence after first weeks of debate(limited as it was)and
i am sure evil doers plot against me and mine,but i can not see them because
the gang members,drug dealers and pimps,obstruct my view.i tie my dogs leash
to my hand so if i am shot,he will not run in front of a car and be killed.how
do i say to my grandson,you can not play with the neighbor kids,because the
dad cooks and sells dope all knight long?police have no interest in there
activity,i have pointed it out to them,as drug dad scowled from his yard.i do
not think dark forces would last long in the hood i am forced to live
in(economics).but hey there are some opening in the apts,and such around
here.move in and you will not be to concerned about the boogie man fred.that
is why i have(legal registered firearms).and if someone comes here to take
them back,the fred.he can have them,as long as i can have a sharp edge.and if
he says i resisted he is a liar.because i am in a third world nation standoff
all alone.

Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

You must be logged
in to post a comment.

RSS FEEDS
RSS
Alex Jones podcast

©2011 PrisonPlanet.com is a Free Speech Systems, LLC
company. All rights reserved. Digital Millennium Copyright Act
Notice.

Digital
Millennium Copyright Act